Pages

Showing posts with label boxing judges. Show all posts
Showing posts with label boxing judges. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Funeka and Guzman Exploit Boxing Weaknesses

by Dafs117

Ali Funeka and Joan Guzman defied the odds to keep the IBF lightweight title vacant after 24 rounds of exchanging leather. But the controversy caused from the two fights has riled many boxing fans, reminding us of the negative side to our sport.

The first fight raised the all-too common problem of poor scoring. The majority thought Ali Funeka had cruised to a unanimous decision victory, with Harold Lederman’s unofficial ringside scorecard at a wide 117-111, and The BTBC's very similar. Michael Buffer announced a majority draw leaving many scratching their heads, even Guzman.

Funeka’s promoter Gary Shaw immediately filed a protest, which like countless protests came to nothing. Funeka however kept his #1 IBF ranking, and when Rolando Reyes vacated his challenger spot, Joan Guzman eagerly stepped in as his replacement.

HBO had already showed their interest in screening Funeka's next bout, agreeing to broadcast on March 27. This was another massive opportunity for Funeka or Guzman to solidify themselves as a HBO fighter and gain further TV time in the future.

Guzman, not that surprisingly, failed to make weight for the second Funeka fight. Just a look at his previous record shows that Guzman has struggled to shed the pounds, again on HBO versus Nate Campbell. What was surprising was that he weighed in nine pounds heavy, an action of unprofessionalism and a show of disrespect towards the game and Funeka as a person.

The IBF could not let the opportunity of sanction fees go by, and decreed that the fight could take place as long as Guzman didn't weigh more than 150 pounds by 7 am on Saturday. Funeka could fill the vacancy, Guzman could not.

Guzman was fined 25% of his purse by the Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC), who gave half of it to Funeka while the other half went into the NSAC's bank account. Guzman entered the ring one, or possibly two weight classes above Funeka, who simply couldn't deal with Guzman's speed and power, losing a twelve-round split decision.

Recent revelations reveal that Funeka was busted for using hydrochlorothiazide, a banned diuretic that helps fighters make weight. The fight gets more meaningless after every shocking development.

HBO should come down hard on Guzman and Funeka, giving neither any broadcasting time in the future. HBO would be sending out all the right signals with regard to a fighter's past record of failing to make weight or drug test.

It's sad to see two fighters who fought at the highest level embarrass themselves by cheating on the biggest stage of their professional careers to try and gain an unfair advantage over their opponent.

Over the past decade, people have been crying out for a change in the boxing setup, fed-up with the way that the sport is run. But this fight is a prime example that boxing has not changed, and the same old antics keep popping up.

These weaknesses and faults were vivid in Funeka-Guzman. Poor scoring from inexperienced judges who are fast-tracked too quickly; promoters acting like managers, creating one publicity stunt after another; greedy alphabet organizations who make a living out of commission fees and a joke out of any Championship; and maybe worst of all, two ill-disciplined fighters who are willing to cheat their way to the top by putting their lives, and their opponents' lives, at risk.

Boxing is slowly climbing out of a slump, but farce fights like this endanger any valuable progress. The boxing world needs to take a stand against the above issues, and there's no time like the present.

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

The Tangled Web of Boxing's Officials

by Paul Magno

The incompetent 119-110 score issued by judge Pierre Benoist after Saturday's Paul Williams-Sergio Martinez bout has inspired a lot of articles and reports about the awful state of judging in the sport we love.

Just one week after Ali Funeka was robbed of a world title by a pair of suspicious 114-114 scores against Joan Guzman, Benoist's wide score completely ripped off the scab that had been healing since Gale Van Hoy incomprehensibly saw Juan Diaz utterly dominate Paulie Malignaggi back in August.

But as amateur and professional boxing pundits alike gnash their teeth about bad decisions and their negative impact on the sport, the wheels keep turning and absolutely nothing is being done to alter an obviously broken system.

Recently, the BPA (Boxing Promoters Association) issued one of the most laughably ironic statements of the year when they "expressed deep concern" over the state of officiating in boxing and offered to create a rating process to judge "competency and integrity" among officials.

Kids running the candy shop?

The most ironic part of their statement is that those officials showing the most competency and integrity would probably end up getting the fewest judging assignments.

Right now, as it stands, the pool of available boxing officials consists mostly of yes men and professional vacationers whose well-paid officiating getaways are paid for directly by the promoters.

Sure, the judges are technically appointed by the commission, but everybody knows that those in the running for appointment are among the group of judges already on the promoter-approved list of acceptable officials. The promoter, who is ultimately footing the bill for the judges, referee and the entire event, will not be forced to accept an appointment that they really don't want.

So, what we get is the same incompetent and/or corrupt officials being passed around from fight to fight with the full knowledge and approval of both promoter and a commission that is just happy to have a revenue-generating event in their home state and a paycheck in their pockets.

At this point, nothing short of a total restructuring of the system will improve the quality of the officiating.

The principal conflict of interest has to be eliminated if things are to improve. This means either establishing a complete separation between the promoter and the officials via strong and independent national commission or by ending the promoter's urgency to protect his own interests by ending his ability to sign fighters to exclusive contracts.

Until we can put an end to this ridiculous conflict of interest where, basically, the officials and fighters are on the same promoter's payroll, there can't be any real level of fair play. The commissions will swear up and down that there is indeed a system of revision and discipline when it comes to their officials, but the truth is easily seen.

And, right now, under the current system, how are the most egregious offenders disciplined for their transgressions?

Well, look at our friend Gale Van Hoy, who was at the center of a firestorm of controversy due to his ridiculous 118-110 score for fellow Texan, Juan Diaz. Van Hoy was punished with a trip to Germany and an assignment to judge a WBC interim title fight.