Pages

Showing posts with label IBF. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IBF. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Say "No" to the Alphabet Soup Organizations in Boxing

by Paul Magno

I don't know of any real fight fans who actually like boxing's four major sanctioning bodies (WBO, WBC, WBA, IBF). As a matter of fact, hardcore fans are unanimous in their disgust for these "Alphabet Soup" Organizations.

The laundry list of offenses is too long to detail in one short article, but with only their own self-interest in mind, these groups have committed just about every offense possible against the sport and it's athletes.

For this reason, The Boxing Tribune is spearheading the campaign to discredit and eventually eliminate these blights on the sport. We urge all fans and websites to join in and support the cause for the betterment of the sport. A large, vocal movement may give fighters and managers the courage and incentive to ditch these now meaningless belts and bring the sport back to where it needs to be.

Join the movement: www.Facebook.com/boxing.reform

It's easy to say "Ditch the Sanctioning Bodies," but what does that really mean and how can the sport exist without the current power structure? Here's a FAQ-style rundown of some of the major sticking points of this movement:

Why get rid of the sanctioning bodies?

To be kind, they're very unnecessary. To be real, they are a blight on the sport and merely exist to line their pockets with the hard-earned money fighters truly deserve. Aside from the bribes and kickbacks that most acknowledge as real parts of the ranking procedure, there's the issue of sanctioning fees. About 3 percent of fighter's purses in all championship fights and official eliminators are handed over to the sanctioning body in charge of the fight...we're talking 5 and 6 figure sanctioning fees just for the right to hold the belt that they earned on their own. But if this isn't bad enough...all 4 major organizations regularly invent new belts and new titles in order to extract more money from more fighters...So, with compromised rankings and a landscape littered with World, Interim, Regular, Super, Diamond, International and Silver champions, the continued existence of these groups is not only bad for the fighters who want a fair, even playing field but, also, for the casual fans who want to follow the sport but get no clear idea of who's who because of all the diluted titles and cartoonish corruption.


Fighters use the sanctioning bodies and the lesser belts as a ladder to climb in their development...What will the young fighters do to get that push and be seen by a large group of fans?

Well, they'd do what they've historically done: Win, make a name for themselves and fight their way to the top. Why should the sanctioning bodies be involved in promoting fighters to new heights? That's what promoters are for. The sanctioning bodies should be for protecting the fighters and making sure that all are fighting on an even playing field.


What about the history and title lineages that accompany these sanctioning bodies?

Well, the sanctioning bodies, as we know them, have only been around since 1962 when some members of the NBA (National Boxing Association) executed a hostile take over of the organization and moved it out of US jurisdiction, renaming it the WBA. Eliminating the modern organizations will do nothing to lessen the importance of the great fighters of the past. And, as far as title lineages go, the arbitrary rules of the sanctioning bodies have already compromised a good share of title lineages.

Ok, They're corrupt, but what would boxing do without at least some sort of sanctioning body?

I'm not endorsing chaos in the sport. Boxing does, indeed, need a sanctioning body, but it needs an organization that will do the right thing and put the sport ahead of the wallets of the boss men. The sport can operate on the same level as other sports do, but a house cleaning is desperately needed in order to start the cleansing process. In the absence of the Alphabet Soup Crew and while a new sanctioning body is being formed, local and state commissions could handle the record keeping and other logistical duties while, short term, the media could handle the rankings. I'll admit, this is not an ideal situation, but the only way to reform is to remove the offending parties. If they still exist and operate as usual, their stranglehold on the sport would be too strong to enact any reform.


Why not work from within and try to reform the existing sanctioning bodies?

48 years of repeat offending have shown us that they simply will not clean up their act...and there's nothing we can really do to force them. Three of the Four sanctioning bodies are based outside US jurisdiction and the one US-based group, the IBF, has already been busted, disassembled and re-formed with little real change.


How can we even do this?

Getting rid of the sanctioning bodies would be as easy as cutting off the cash supply. Six to Nine months of no sanctioning fees or kick-backs would significantly cripple them. A lot depends on whether fighters and managers would join in the movement or if they'd rather continue on with the corrupt current scene that allows them a chance to buy their way to the top. I guess this movement would also say a lot about the integrity of many active participants in the sport and whether they'd choose to play on a level playing field if given a choice.

How can we ensure that the next sanctioning body wouldn't fall into the same corrupt pattern as the ones we have now?

Remove the profit factor and the veil of secrecy; That would just about do it. Make the rankings based upon a fair, objective formula that takes activity and level of opposition within a given weight class into consideration. Publish the formula, make it simple enough to verify and keep it as an untouchable method of ranking fighters. When it comes to money issues, make all financial dealings 100% transparent. Yes, sanctioning fees do need to be charged, but the current rate is too high. A scaled-down, small government-style sanctioning body would require less of an operating budget than the massive bureaucracies that currently exist only to sustain themselves. The new sanctioning body's responsibilities would be to supervise the officials, ensure for the safety of the fighters and oversee officially sanctioned bouts. All of this, of course, would take place in complete transparency with all meetings transcribed, observed and posted in a public forum and all revenue paths clearly earmarked.

Believe me, I have no delusions of grandeur regarding this issue. Maybe this is the greatest of pipe dreams, but I owe a lot to this sport and have nothing but the greatest respect for those warriors who risk their lives each and every time they step into the ring. To have a bunch of middle-aged confidence men divvying up these warriors' hard-earned money is just obscene. And to have the sport riddled with bogus titles and bought rankings that ruin all credibility is sickening. I just couldn't live with myself if I didn't at least make my voice heard...this is your chance to make your voices heard as well...And, maybe, together we can make a loud enough noise.

Join the movement...Say "No" to the Alphabet Soup Organizations in Boxing:

www.Facebook.com/boxing.reform

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Americans, Get Over Yourselves: Klitschkos Are Kings!


by Paul Magno

Boxing fans from 110 countries around the world will be watching a world heavyweight title fight this Saturday as Wladimir Klitschko defends his IBF and WBO heavyweight titles against, literally, America's last chance at snagging a real heavyweight title, "Fast" Eddie Chambers.

If you're reading this in the United States, though, you'll have to settle for a $14.95 internet-only pay per view screening on the small screen.

Sounds frickin' insane.

I sort of buy HBO's excuse that the European start time would be too early in the United States and would take a beating against the NCAA basketball tourney. So, for the money required, the bout is not economically viable for the network. Ok.

But what I can't understand is the sentiment among American fight fans and the almost glee some are taking that the fight isn't being broadcast.

The excuse made is that the Klitschkos are boring and that Wladimir, especially, is a chore to watch.

However, these same fans that whine about the Klitschkos are often the same ones who have high regard for a guy like Ivan Calderon, the jr. flyweight champ whose fights often turn into mind-numbing track meets. And these are the same fans who tolerate Paulie Malignaggi's jab-and-grabs and HBO-supported Rocky Juarez as he tries for one world title after another.

I don't buy the critics' sudden high standards when it comes to the fights they watch.

It's more likely that the critics are just frustrated that no American fighter can come close to handling the Eastern European kingpins. Americans are supposed to rule the heavyweight division; It's our division, home of Ali, Marciano, Dempsey, Louis and Frazier.

So, with an absence of dominant US heavyweights and with little hope for the future, the fans have just taken to ignoring the Klitschkos. "Let's just close our eyes and make believe they don't exist...we'll open them in a couple of years and hope for the best."

Yes, it's frustrating to see fighter after fight fall at the hands of the Klitschkos, but since when has the American attitude been, "If you can't beat 'em, marginalize 'em?"

It's not Wlad's and Vitali's fault that Tony Thompson and Kevin Johnson couldn't pull the trigger, it's not their fault that Sam Peter and Ruslan Chagaev were shut out and it sure as hell isn't their fault that Chris Arreola keeps losing the directions to his gym.

I'm not a big fan of the Klitschkos and I'll be overjoyed if Eddie Chambers finds a way to bring home the world title, but I think it's just plain petty that the American public, en masse, has decided to proudly snub the legit world champions.

Wladimir and Vitali Klitschko have taken on all comers and have conducted themselves with class and dignity. And, no, sorry...they are not overwhelmingly boring.

America, get over yourself...If you can't build the perfect heavyweight, at least recognize the best of the best right now. You should be ashamed of yourself for marginalizing the world champion; You shouldn't be celebrating the fact that you've succeeded in burying your head in the sand.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Adamek vs. Gunn...Nigga, Please!

After one of the biggest title mismatches in the history of the Cruiserweight division, one question remains regarding the Tomasz Adamek-Bobby Gunn bout on Saturday: Why?

Why did the IBF see fit to sanction this farce as a World Title bout? Why Bobby Gunn? Why has Gunn, a D- club fighter, received two shots at a Cruiserweight title (The other being a one round blow-out loss to Enzo Maccarinelli)? Why did Tomasz Adamek choose to tarnish an otherwise stellar reign with this garbage? Why did people pay hard-earned money to buy tickets or order the fight via online PPV?

So many questions...

What's gospel, though, is that this human sacrifice was peddled to the public as a World Title defense when there are literally dozens of fighters more deserving than Gunn, even as tune-up defenses.

Brothers and Sisters, security camera footage of senior citizens being mugged would've been less of a mismatch than what I saw on Saturday.

IBF, Team Adamek..."Nigga, Please!"


Dedicated to the late, great Ol' Dirty Bastard, the heart and soul of the Wu Tang Clan, the "Nigga, Please!" award will be given to a fighter, event or situation that is just plain stupid enough to garner ODB's famous phrase of disgusted disbelief, "Nigga, Please!"

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Yet Another Title Shot for Zab Judah?

Boxingscene.com is reporting on a rumor that would have Boxing's answer to the Washington Generals, Zab Judah, on the verge of getting yet another shot at a World Title.

The story has Judah moving back down to Jr. Welterweight to take on top challenger, Randall Bailey for Juan Urango's soon-to-be-vacant 140 lb. IBF crown despite the fact that Judah hasn't been active in that weight class since 2003.

If the fight goes down as rumored, it'll be on the undercard of Floyd Mayweather vs. Juan Manuel Marquez. This would be Judah's 18th World Title Fight. He's 0 for his last 4 and hasn't been on the winning end of a title fight in over 4 years. Go figure...

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Dawson vs. Tarver 2: Electric Boogaloo


What do you get when you cross a binding union-style contract with a sporting event?

- You get Chad Dawson vs. Antonio Tarver II for Dawson's IBF Light Heavyweight title.

Rematch clauses can be a positive thing, but shouldn't there be an escape clause when the first bout was a near shutout? This rematch makes about as much sense as Pacquiao/Hatton 2 or Pavlik/Hopkins: The Revenge.

I had so little interest in this bout that I was dragging my feet even posting this report. People, Chad Dawson is in a good number of Pound-for-Pound lists, we should care about who he's fighting. When Tarver got owned in the first fight, common sense dictated that Tarver should move to the back of the line.

And this is not a crack at Tarver. I like Antonio Tarver despite the rampant hating that goes on about him and his career. He's a guy who entered the pro ranks very late in life and still found a way to have a near-Hall of Fame career. Tarver has beaten just about every top Light Heavyweight of this generation with the exception of Dawson and Hopkins. He deserves respect for what he's accomplished, but he doesn't deserve this rematch.

Unfortunately for Dawson, this pointless sequel is probably the biggest money fight right now for him at 175. The pickings are slim at Light Heavy and don't look to be getting much better any time soon.

I'm seeing this fight much like I see jury duty: Just put up with it, try to think happy thoughts and take solace in the fact that you'll be done with the necessary evil and can move on with your life...

By the way, Dawson weighed in at 175 and Tarver at 172...